Armchair Dragoons Forums

The Reference Desk => References & Research => Topic started by: mirth on September 17, 2018, 12:17:12 PM

Title: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: mirth on September 17, 2018, 12:17:12 PM
Lord, he was terrible

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/mcclellan-antietam
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: mirth on September 17, 2018, 12:41:02 PM
This story, I did not know
https://taskandpurpose.com/how-a-drunk-decision-by-a-terrible-commanding-officer-led-to-a-medal-of-honor/
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: Barthheart on September 17, 2018, 12:50:04 PM
This story, I did not know
https://taskandpurpose.com/how-a-drunk-decision-by-a-terrible-commanding-officer-led-to-a-medal-of-honor/

Wow!  :bigthumb:
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on September 17, 2018, 01:22:21 PM
Very interesting - thanks for posting that  :bigthumb:
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on September 17, 2018, 03:58:14 PM
Lord, he was terrible

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/mcclellan-antietam

Its true, and yet when you look at him as a leader and administrator, its a different story as he really pulled the Union Army together and gave it esprit de corps. Its just a pity that as a high level commander he failed. As I recall, his early battlefield leadership in West Virginia (?) was commendable.
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: mirth on September 17, 2018, 04:05:50 PM
He won a couple of minor battles in W. VA. Mostly he didn't lose them. However it was enough to get Lincoln's attention.

He was indisputably an excellent organizer and trainer of troops. His troops absolutely loved him.
And those are about the only positive things I'll ever say about George Brinton McClellan.
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: besilarius on December 04, 2018, 07:28:18 AM
The saddle he designed was in use for a long time.
Probably the cavalry troopers enjoyed putting their butts on a McClellan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McClellan_saddle
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on December 04, 2018, 08:51:34 AM
Yeah, I'd read about that before. Seems it actually became more-or-less standard issue.

I remember seeing a picture of him somewhere riding his black horse 'Dan Webster'.
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: panzerde on April 17, 2019, 05:24:27 PM
While I'm definitely no fan of McClellan, after reading Carman's The Antietam Campaign some of what he did during that campaign now makes more sense to me. Carman was actually there, and isn't really a McClellan advocate, but makes a good case that at least some of the criticism he faced later was misplaced and politically motivated.

I found the sections concerning the speed of the AOTP's advance from Washington particularly interesting, along with the bit on Harper's Ferry.  Well worth the read.

He was still a tool, though.
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on April 17, 2019, 06:34:43 PM
You still can't get away from the fact that he fed divisions in piecemeal, and never used a large part of his available troops. We see the same over-caution during the peninsular campaign.

Agreed he always had in his mind the fact the he commanded the only major force that could protect Washington, and that seemed to cloud his judgement.

He was without doubt a great administrator, and really gave esprit de corps to the AotP, but he was a failure when it came to making offensive decisions. He did well early on in the war when commanding fewer troops..
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: panzerde on April 17, 2019, 10:55:41 PM
You still can't get away from the fact that he fed divisions in piecemeal, and never used a large part of his available troops. We see the same over-caution during the peninsular campaign.

Agreed he always had in his mind the fact the he commanded the only major force that could protect Washington, and that seemed to cloud his judgement.

He was without doubt a great administrator, and really gave esprit de corps to the AotP, but he was a failure when it came to making offensive decisions. He did well early on in the war when commanding fewer troops..

Like I said, no great fan, and his conduct during and after the battle was disastrous.  What Carman points out is that the criticism that he was too slow to advance is really false; he was no slower than any other commander of the AOTP was before or after, and he actually made pretty good speed.  I would definitely read Carman before making any judgments about that campaign.  Not only was the man present, he spent literally the rest of his life interviewing other participants from both sides and was the chief historical expert for the Antietam National Battlefield after it was established. He sheds a lot of light on things. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezra_A._Carman
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on April 18, 2019, 09:02:53 AM
Looks like there is no Kindle version :-(
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: panzerde on April 18, 2019, 09:51:31 AM
Looks like there is no Kindle version :-(

https://www.amazon.com/Maryland-Campaign-September-1862-Mountain-ebook/dp/B0042VJ1LM/ref=pd_sim_351_1/134-4423333-2561237?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=B0042VJ1LM&pd_rd_r=fd0718c0-61e0-11e9-9672-417ebf68296c&pd_rd_w=B92qF&pd_rd_wg=FoHO5&pf_rd_p=a098ee4c-2e0f-4821-b463-d4b049053104&pf_rd_r=9E52NME1AHT63H1YH8SB&psc=1&refRID=9E52NME1AHT63H1YH8SB
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on April 18, 2019, 10:02:22 AM
Thanks Doug, although is that not a different book to the one mentioned earlier?
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: panzerde on April 18, 2019, 01:39:55 PM
Thanks Doug, although is that not a different book to the one mentioned earlier?

It's the book I was thinking of, just not what I called it...  :doh:
Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bayonetbrant on April 22, 2019, 03:27:32 PM
https://twitter.com/CivilWarHumor/status/1120398272118571009

Title: Re: McClellan at Antietam
Post by: bob48 on April 22, 2019, 03:36:05 PM
Haha.