Armchair Dragoons Forums

News:

  • The ACDC returns in 2025!  17-19 January 2025 we'll gather online for a variety of games and chats all weekend long
  • The 2024 Armchair Dragoons Fall Assembly will be held 11-13 October 2024 at The Gamer's Armory in Cary, NC (outside of Raleigh)

News

The 2024 Armchair Dragoons Fall Assembly will be held 11-13 October 2024 at The Gamer's Armory in Cary, NC (outside of Raleigh)

Author Topic: Map size?  (Read 8177 times)

Martok

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Lance Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 6936
  • Tilting at windmills
on: August 02, 2022, 08:34:31 PM
Battlegoat Studio's video about galaxy sizes in Galactic Ruler got me to wondering:  When it comes to 4x games, what size map does everyone generally prefer to play on? 



For myself, I typically like to play on the largest map sizes possible, albeit within limits.  (Remnants of the Precursors, for example, lets you play with galaxies of over 10,000 stars.  While I love the fact that it's possible, even for me, that's a bit much.)  The bigger the game-world, the more epic in scope, the more I like it. 

The major downside to this, of course, is pacing:  Games on big maps tend to take a *long* time to play out.  The late/end-game phase, in particular, can really drag on, which makes games difficult to finish -- in fact, I'm much more likely to abandon games on larger maps because of this issue.  It's a pretty problem the genre has never really solved IMO. 


I find the alternative -- playing on smaller maps -- is simply trading one problem for another.  Sure, games move much more quickly, but you also have little time for exploring, which is usually my favorite part of any 4x title.  Small maps *can* still be fun, though, especially in games that are more oriented around war/combat.  In addition, there's definitely something to be said for actually being able to finish a game now & then. 



"I like big maps and I cannot lie." - Barthheart

"I drastically overpaid for this existence." - bbmike


thecommandtent

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Corporal
  • *
  • Posts: 1296
Reply #1 on: August 02, 2022, 08:45:37 PM
I love the exploring part of 4x games so I always play with the biggest map size.  I agree about late game dragging on and I usually don't end up finishing them.



bayonetbrant

  • Arrogance Mitigator & Event "Organizer"
  • Administrator
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 16160
  • Going mad, but at least going somewhere
    • Six Degrees of Radio
Reply #2 on: August 02, 2022, 08:56:19 PM
Need a vote option for "fucking huge" ;)

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=++

Random acts of genius and other inspirations of applied violence.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
Six Degrees of Radio for songs you should know by artists you should love


ojsdad

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 2739
Reply #3 on: August 02, 2022, 09:36:28 PM
I love a very large map.  But besides the late game game dragging, I feel that most developers never consider the UI for large maps.  They build a single UI that is supposed to fit for all sizes, but that's often not the case.

Here at ACD, we all pee the same color.


Barthheart

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 4721
  • Retired curmudgeon
Reply #4 on: August 02, 2022, 09:59:43 PM
Need a vote option for "fucking huge" ;)

This.

PETS - People for the Ethical Treatment of Square corners


Martok

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Lance Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 6936
  • Tilting at windmills
Reply #5 on: August 03, 2022, 02:08:14 AM
Fine, fine.  I reset the votes and added a "FUCKING HUGE!" option.  Y'all happy now?  :P 



"I like big maps and I cannot lie." - Barthheart

"I drastically overpaid for this existence." - bbmike


bayonetbrant

  • Arrogance Mitigator & Event "Organizer"
  • Administrator
  • Staff Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 16160
  • Going mad, but at least going somewhere
    • Six Degrees of Radio
Reply #6 on: August 03, 2022, 06:16:16 AM
Fine, fine.  I reset the votes and added a "FUCKING HUGE!" option.  Y'all happy now?  :P

Yes, but only because there isn't a bigger option from the games themselves

=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=++

Random acts of genius and other inspirations of applied violence.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
Six Degrees of Radio for songs you should know by artists you should love


bbmike

  • Warrant Officer
  • Lance Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 7598
    • My Own Worst Enemy
Reply #7 on: August 03, 2022, 08:17:48 AM
Small. I prefer to immerse myself into the game and with small maps I get to know all of the systems. With those "fucking huge" maps it is too much to keep "fucking track" of. I also prefer small fleets for the same reason. It has more meaning to lose the ACD Enterprise vs a fleet of 1,000 no name ships.

"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence."
-Sherlock Holmes

My Own Worst Enemy


thecommandtent

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Corporal
  • *
  • Posts: 1296
Reply #8 on: August 03, 2022, 07:29:16 PM
Small. I prefer to immerse myself into the game and with small maps I get to know all of the systems. With those "fucking huge" maps it is too much to keep "fucking track" of. I also prefer small fleets for the same reason. It has more meaning to lose the ACD Enterprise vs a fleet of 1,000 no name ships.

I totally get that and kind of do that on a huge map.  I tend to have a "pet" army or unit that I immersive myself in while the rest of the chaos swirls around the huge map :)  Who says I can't play favorites and funnel a empires resources to spot  :3musketeer:



BanzaiCat

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Lance Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 6638
  • Puns Puns Puns Puns
Reply #9 on: August 03, 2022, 10:31:50 PM
Small to medium. I don't have a lot of room, and if I did, I wouldn't have time for anything larger.

============================================

Solosaurus Podcast: https://solosaurus.libsyn.com/
(includes Solosaurus Plays)


Barthheart

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 4721
  • Retired curmudgeon
Reply #10 on: August 04, 2022, 06:47:52 AM
Small to medium. I don't have a lot of room, and if I did, I wouldn't have time for anything larger.

This poll is for computer games....  :Loser:

PETS - People for the Ethical Treatment of Square corners


bbmike

  • Warrant Officer
  • Lance Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 7598
    • My Own Worst Enemy
Reply #11 on: August 04, 2022, 07:53:20 AM
 ;D

"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence."
-Sherlock Holmes

My Own Worst Enemy


Undercovergeek

  • Sergeant
  • ***
  • Posts: 2162
Reply #12 on: August 04, 2022, 08:08:55 AM
I didn’t want to tell him



ojsdad

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 2739
Reply #13 on: August 04, 2022, 07:08:34 PM
Fine, fine.  I reset the votes and added a "FUCKING HUGE!" option.  Y'all happy now?  :P

Yes, but only because there isn't a bigger option from the games themselves

Could of us d pron huge  ;D

Here at ACD, we all pee the same color.


Martok

  • Patreon Supporters
  • Lance Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 6936
  • Tilting at windmills
Reply #14 on: August 05, 2022, 03:43:55 PM
Small. I prefer to immerse myself into the game and with small maps I get to know all of the systems. With those "fucking huge" maps it is too much to keep "fucking track" of. I also prefer small fleets for the same reason. It has more meaning to lose the ACD Enterprise vs a fleet of 1,000 no name ships.

Yep, totally get that. 

I would love to see a modern version of Starships Unlimited 3, or something similar.  I love the concept, but the game is definitely showing its age.  And at least for me,  it's not the easiest game to play. 




Small to medium. I don't have a lot of room, and if I did, I wouldn't have time for anything larger.

This poll is for computer games....  :Loser:

Eh, it can apply to boardgames too.  He has a good point. 



"I like big maps and I cannot lie." - Barthheart

"I drastically overpaid for this existence." - bbmike