Honestly, yes, I would. Of all the modern Total War games, Thrones is my 2nd-favorite (after Rome II).
Although I will say that with ToB in particular, how likely you are to enjoy the game probably depends more than usual on what you like about the TW series (especially the historical titles), and which aspects are important to you.
As a prime example, Thrones is often criticized for not having a great deal of variety between the various factions' army rosters. However, anyone with at least a cursory knowledge of the time period knows how warfare was generally dominated by the shield-wall. Therefore, most factions' army rosters are going to consist of mostly infantry -- a fact that I appreciate and enjoy.
Likewise, Thrones sometimes gets criticized for having "boring" battles. Again, however, when you have opposing shield-walls grinding against and hacking at each other, it's not exactly as if there's always a lot of finesse to it.
![tongue :P](https://www.armchairdragoons.com/forum/Smileys/brant/tongue.gif)
Which doesn't mean that other unit types and good tactics (holding the high ground, flanking the enemy, etc.) don't still matter, obviously, but they aren't quite as crucial compared to most of the other series' entries.
I guess what it boils down to is that one of Thrones' main critiques is that the game is *too* historically accurate, not that anyone ever actually phrases it that way. And in reality it definitely isn't "overly" accurate -- there's plenty of realism that was left on the cutting room floor, so to speak -- but it's funny to think about it in those terms.